THE BIGGEST HOLOCAUST IN WORLD HISTORY

The genocide suffered by the Hindus of India at the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and Afghan occupying forces for a period of 800 years is as yet formally unrecognised by the World.

The only similar genocide in the recent past was that of the Jewish people at the hands of the Nazis; of the Africans during the slave trade and also the almost total extermination of native populations like the Aboriginal people in Australia and the native Indians, Aztecs, Incas, etc. in North and South America.

The holocaust of the Hindus in India was of even greater proportions, the only difference was that it continued for 800 years, till the brutal regimes were effectively overpowered in a life and death struggle by the Sikhs in the Punjab and the Hindu Maratha armies in other parts of India in the late 1700's.

We have elaborate literary evidence of the World’s biggest holocaust from existing historical contemporary eyewitness accounts. The historians and biographers of the invading armies and subsequent rulers of India have left quite detailed records of the atrocities they committed in their day-to-day encounters with India’s Hindus.

These contemporary records boasted about and glorified the crimes that were committed - and the genocide of tens of millions of Hindus, mass rapes of Hindu women and the destruction of thousands of ancient Hindu / Buddhist temples and libraries have been well d ocumented and provide solid proof of the World's biggest holocaust.

Muhammad bin Qasim Al-Thaqafi  (c. 31 December 695–18 July 715) was an Umayyad general who conquered the Sindh and Punjab regions along the Indus River(now a part of Pakistan) for the Umayyad Caliphate He was born and raised in the city of Taif (in modern day Saudi Arabia). Qasim's conquest of Sindh and Punjab enabled further Islamic expansion into the Indian subcontinent.

Quotes from modern historians
 Dr. Koenraad Elst in his article “Was There an Islamic Genocide of Hindus?” states:

 “There is no official estimate of the total death toll of Hindus at the hands of Islam. A first glance at important testimonies by Muslim chroniclers suggests that, over 13 centuries and a territory as vast as the Subcontinent, Muslim Holy Warriors easily killed more Hindus than the 6 million of the Holocaust. Ferishtha lists several occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a minimum goal whenever they felt like punishing the Hindus; and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty.The biggest slaughters took place during the raids of Mahmud Ghaznavi (ca. 1000 CE); during the actual conquest of North India by Mohammed Ghori and his lieutenants (1192 ff.); and under the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526)."

He also writes in his book "Negation in India":

"The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter."
 
Will Durant argued in his 1935 book "The Story of Civilisation: Our Oriental Heritage" (page 459):

"The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period."
 Francois Gautier in his book 'Rewriting Indian History' (1996) wrote:
"The massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese."
   Fernand Braudel wrote in A History of Civilisations (1995), that Islamic rule in India as a

 "colonial experiment" was "extremely violent", and "the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm – burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalements, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves."
  Alain Danielou in his book, Histoire de l' Inde writes:

"From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of  murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions. It is, as usual, in the name of 'a holy war' of their faith, of their sole God, that the barbarians have destroyed civilizations, wiped out entire races."
  Irfan Husain in his article “Demons from the Past” observes:

“While historical events should be judged in the context of their times, it cannot be denied that even in that bloody period of history, no mercy was shown to the Hindus unfortunate enough to be in the path of either the Arab conquerors of Sindh and south Punjab, or the Central Asians who swept in from Afghanistan…The Muslim heroes who figure larger than life in our history books committed some dreadful crimes. Mahmud of Ghazni, Qutb-ud-Din Aibak, Balban, Mohammed bin Qasim, and Sultan Mohammad Tughlak, all have blood-stained hands that the passage of years has not cleansed..Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of their homeland was an unmitigated disaster.

"Their temples were razed, their idols smashed, their women raped, their men killed or taken slaves. When Mahmud of Ghazni entered Somnath on one of his annual raids, he slaughtered all 50,000 inhabitants. Aibak killed and enslaved hundreds of thousands. The list of horrors is long and painful. These conquerors justified their deeds by claiming it was their religious duty to smite non-believers. Cloaking themselves in the banner of Islam, they claimed they were fighting for their faith when, in reality, they were indulging in straightforward slaughter and pillage...”

A sample of contemporary eyewitness accounts of the invaders and rulers, during the Indian conquests 
The  Afghan ruler Mahmud al-Ghazni invaded India no less than seventeen times between 1001 - 1026 AD. The book ‘Tarikh-i-Yamini’ - written by his secretary documents several episodes of his bloody military campaigns : "The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously [at the Indian city of Thanesar] that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it…the infidels deserted the fort and tried to cross the foaming river...but many of them were slain, taken or drowned... Nearly fifty thousand men were killed."
  

In the contemporary record - ' Taj-ul-Ma’asir' by Hassn Nizam-i-Naishapuri, it is stated that when Qutb-ul- Din Aibak (of Turko - Afghan origin and the First Sultan of Delhi 1194-1210 AD) conquered Meerat, he demolished all the Hindu temples of the city and erected mosques on their sites. In the city of Aligarh, he converted Hindu inhabitants to Islam by the sword and beheaded all those who adhered to their own religion.
 
The Persian historian Wassaf writes in his book 'Tazjiyat-ul-Amsar wa Tajriyat ul Asar' that when the Alaul-Din Khilji (An Afghan of Turkish origin and second ruler of the Khilji Dynasty in India 1295-1316 AD) captured the city of Kambayat at the head of the gulf of Cambay, he killed the adult male Hindu inhabitants for the glory of Islam, set flowing rivers of blood, sent the women of the country with all their gold, silver, and jewels, to his own home, and made about twentv thousand Hindu maidens his private slaves. 

This ruler once asked his spiritual advisor (or ‘Qazi’) as to what was the Islamic law prescribed for the Hindus. The Qazi replied:

“Hindus are like the mud; if silver is demanded from them, they must with the greatest humility offer gold. If a Mohammadan desires to spit into a Hindu’s mouth, the Hindu should open it wide for the purpose. God created the Hindus to be slaves of the Mohammadans. The Prophet hath ordained that, if the Hindus do not accept Islam, they should be imprisoned, tortured, finally put to death, and their property confiscated.”
  
Timur was a Turkic conqueror and founder of the Timurid Dynasty. Timur's Indian campaign (1398 – 1399 AD) was recorded in his memoirs, collectively known as 'Tuzk-i-Timuri.' In them, he vividly described probably the greatest gruesome act in the entire history of the world – where 100,000 Hindu prisoners of war in his camp were executed in a very short space of time. Timur after taking advice from his entourage says in his memoirs :

"they said that on the great day of battle these 100,000 prisoners could not be left with the baggage, and that it would be entirely opposed to the rules of war to set these idolaters and foes of Islam at liberty.

"In fact, no other course remained but that of making them all food for the sword’

Timur thereupon resolved to put them to death. He proclaimed :

"throughout the camp that every man who has infidel prisoners was to put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer. When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death. 100,000 infidels, impious idolaters, were on that day slain. Maulana Nasir-ud-din Umar, a counselor and a man of learning, who, in all his life had never killed a sparrow, now, in execution of my order, slew with his sword fifteen idolatrous Hindus, who were his captives".
 During his campaign in India - Timur describes the scene when his army conquered the Indian city of Delhi :

"In a short space of time all the people in the [Delhi] fort were put to the sword, and in the course of one hour the heads of 10,000 infidels were cut off. The sword of Islam was washed in the blood of the infidels, and all the goods and effects, the treasure and the grain which for many a long year had been stored in the fort became the spoil of my soldiers.

"They set fire to the houses and reduced them to ashes, and they razed the buildings and the fort to the ground....All these infidel Hindus were slain, their women and children, and their property and goods became the spoil of the victors. I proclaimed throughout the camp that every man who had infidel prisoners should put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer. When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death."
 
The Mughal emperor Babur (who ruled India from 1526 -1530 AD) writing in his memoirs called the 'Baburnama' -  wrote : " In AH 934 (2538 C.E.) I attacked Chanderi and by the grace of Allah captured it in a few hours.  We got the infidels slaughtered and the place which had been Daru'l-Harb (nation of non-muslims) for years was made into a Daru'l-Islam (a muslim nation)."
In Babur's own words in a poem about killing Hindus (From the 'Baburnama' ) he wrote :

"For the sake of Islam I became a wanderer,
I battled infidels and Hindus,
I determined to become a martyr
Thank God I became a Killer of Non-Muslims!"
 
The atrocities of the Mughal ruler Shah Jahan (who ruled India between 1628 - 1658 AD) are mentioned in the contemporary record called : 'Badshah Nama, Qazinivi & Badshah Nama , Lahori' and goes on to state : "When Shuja was appointed as governor of Kabul he carried on a ruthless war in the Hindu territory beyond Indus...The sword of Islam yielded a rich crop of converts....Most of the women (to save their honour) burnt themselves to death. Those captured were distributed among Muslim Mansabdars (Noblemen)"

The Afghan ruler Ahmad Shah Abdali attacked India in 1757 AD and made his way to the holy Hindu city of Mathura, the Bethlehem of the Hindus and birthplace ofKrishna.

The atrocities that followed are recorded in the contemporary chronicle called : 'Tarikh-I-Alamgiri' :

"Abdali's soldiers would be paid  5 Rupees (a sizeable amount at the time) for every enemy head brought in. Every horseman had loaded up all his horses with the plundered property, and atop of it rode the girl-captives and the slaves. The severed heads were tied up in rugs like bundles of grain and placed on the heads of the captives...Then the heads were stuck upon lances and taken to the gate of the chief minister for payment.

"It was an extraordinary display! Daily did this manner of slaughter and plundering proceed. And at night the shrieks of the women captives who were being raped, deafened the ears of the people...All those heads that had been cut off were built into pillars, and the captive men upon whose heads those bloody bundles had been brought in, were made to grind corn, and then their heads too were cut off. These things went on all the way to the city of Agra, nor was any part of the country spared."
 Why we should remember
"Holocaust Memorial Day (HMD) is the international day of remembrance for the victims of the Holocaust and of other genocides" (Holocaust Memorial Day Trust)

The biggest holocaust in World History has been whitewashed from history.

When we hear the word HOLOCAUST most of us think immediately of the Jewish holocaust. Today, with increased awareness and countless cinema films and television documentaries - many of us are also aware of the Holocaust of the Native American peoples, the genocide of the Armenian peoples in the Ottoman Empire, and the millions of African lives lost during the Atlantic slave trade.

The World  seems to either ignore or just does not seem to care about the many millions of lives lost during the 800 - year long holocaust of Hindus in India.

The Indian historian Professor K.S. Lal estimates that the Hindu population in India decreased by 80 million between 1000 AD and 1525 AD, an extermination unparalleled in World history. This slaughter of millions of people occurred over regular periods during many centuries of Arab, Afghan, Turkish and Mughal rule in India.

Many Indian heroes emerged during these dark times – including the 10th Sikh Guru - Guru Gobind Singh and also the Hindu Maratha king – Shivaji Maratha , and also Maha rana prathap –the – who led the resistance against this tyranny and eventually led to its defeat by the late 1700s - after centuries of death and destruction.

 

The modern World today is facing a global threat from organizations and groups of terrorists such as the Taliban ,Al-Qaeeda , Indian Mujahadheen and Jaish-e-mohammed - whose ideology is chillingly similar to that of the perpetrators of the World’s biggest holocaust in India. Also ironically – these terrorist groups are growing and launching attacks in exactly those areas that suffered extensively during India’s holocaust. Let us hope that the bloody lessons of the past are learnt so that history does not even have the remotest chance of repeating itself.

Europe never forgot or forgave the attrocities of nazi ruler Hitler. Noone talks about Hitler as a great warrior or inspiring leader of German people. Europe and America produced more than a hundred films higlighting the human misery caused by Hitler and his Army. The films expose horrors of nazi regime and reinforces the beliefs and attitudes of present day generation towards the evil of nazi dictatorship.

In contrast look at India, there is hardly any awareness among the indians of today of what happened to their ancestors in past. It is not difficult for the historians to gather the information ,but they are reluctant to touch this sensitive subject, thinking that this may hurt Muslims.  The films which produced in India shows thesecruel rulers as great heroes of noble virtues oozing with kindness and love for humanity (see, Mughal-e-asam, Anarkali, Tajmahal,Jodha Akbar etc).

In what context we talk about Hitler and Nazis in India. The disturbing answer is that anyone who speaks this truth or speaks for Hindus is a Hitler and any group or organisations working for Hindus are called as Nazis. What an irony……

thanks ,  bnp.org.uk, hinduwebsite.com

 

 

WHY BABRI MASJID WAS DEMOLISHED

BABUR

Zahir-ud-din Muhammad Babur (14 February 1483 – 26 December 1530; was a conqueror from Central Asia who, following a series of setbacks, finally succeeded in laying the basis for the Mughal dynasty in the Indian Subcontinent and became the first Mughal emperor.  In the First battle of panipat in 1526 he defeated Ibrahim Lodi, and laid the foundation of  Mughal Empire.

He was intolerant towards Hindus..  His Atrocious include killing of Hindus, forced conversions, rapes of women, demolishing Hindu temples and erecting Mosques there.  In Babur's own words in a poem about killing Hindus (From the 'Baburnama' ) he wrote :

"For the sake of Islam I became a wanderer, I battled infidels and Hindus,
I determined to become a martyr
Thank God I became a Killer of Non-Muslims!"

He also wrote : " In AH 934 (2538 C.E.) I attacked Chanderi and by the grace of Allah captured it in a few hours.  We got the infidels slaughtered and the place which had been Daru'l-Harb (nation of non-muslims) for years was made into a Daru'l-Islam (a Muslim nation)."

Babur established his authority over the whole of northern India when he conquered the Rajputana kingdom of Mewar and the Hindu King of Chittodgad, Rana Sangrama Singh, at the Battle of Khanwa. After this victory, his general, Mir Baqshi became governor of the region around Awadh.

Mir Baqshi built the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya naming it after Emperor Babur, after destroying a pre-existing temple of Rama at the site . Although there is no reference to the new mosque in Babur's diary, the Baburnama, the pages of the relevant period are missing in the diary. The contemporary Tarikh-i-Babari records that Babur's troops "demolished many Hindu temples at Chanderi^.

As it was clear that Babur was intolerant towards Hindus and Hindu temples, one shouldn’t have to doubt and ask for evidence that he actually demolished it or not. We can see a hundreds of examples in India which clearly shows how Muslim rulers treated Hindu temples and converted it to mosques.   Now the debates are going on as weather there was a Temple before.  Even though the Archaeological society of India stated that there was a Hindu Temple before the Masjid; after their latest excavations , some are still not ready to accept..  But for me , there is no need to rely on ASI. If the place is Ayodhya, its  Bhagvan Rams Birth place and there should not be any thing other than his Temple





DEMOLITION OF BABRI:
On December 6^th 1992, about 1, 50000 karsewaks gathered around the disputed building and Demolished it with the blessings of BJP and VHP leaders.



SIGNIFICANCE OF AYODHYA.

Ayodhya is located on the right bank of the river Sarayu, 6 km from Faizabad,Uttar pradesh. This town is closely associated with Rama, Seventh incarnation of GOD Vishnu. According to the Ramayana, the city is 9,000 years old, and was founded by Manu, the first man in the Vedas, and law-giver of the Hindus. Other sources hold that it was founded by its namesake, King Ayudh. For centuries, it was the capital for the Surya dynasty, of which Lord Rama was the most celebrated king

Skanda and other puranas list Ayodhya as one of the seven most sacred cities of India, as it has been the backdrop for much of Hindu scripture.
 In the Atharvaveda, Ayodhya was described as 'made by Gods and prosperous as Heaven itself'.
 Valmiki began writing the Ramayana in Ayodhya. Its opening chapters recount the magnificence of the city, the glories of its monarch and the virtues, wealth and loyalty of its people. Kamban or Tulsidas retold a common version of the Ramayana called the Ramacharitamanasa in which he also praised the city.


WHY HINDUS  DEMOLISHED BABRI MASJID
So in short Ayodhya is a Sacred place for Hindus..    They respect it, its holiness.  Ayodhya is as much as important for Hindus like Bethlehem for Christians, Mecca for Muslims. 

What Muslims would have done, if they found a Hindu Temple in Mecca?   What they will do, if some powerful Western country attack and build a church by demolishing the present mosque in Mecca…    Definitely, the whole Muslim community will wait for an appropriate time after gaining strength to wipe away the church/Temple and bring back their mosque.  Because their faith teaches them that this place is holy. 

 I just take the example of Mecca because it is the holiest place for Muslims all over world…    We all know that Muslims never allow such a monument of others religions in their territory.  Hundreds of Hindu temples have been demolished in Pakistan and Afghanistan( due to hatred and in name of construction of shopping buildings); both were the part of Indian Territory once.   When the Babri masjid demolished in India, Hundreds of temples in both these countries where destroyed.  Why everybody cares only about Babri, what about those Temples destroyed

The Muslims should have think about this..  There are hundreds of temples demolished and mosques erected on their ruins early from 8th century in Indian soil by the foreign Muslim invaders.  But Hindus didn’t demand the destruction of those structures.  They didn’t act like the same manner what happening in neighbouring countries.  Hindus just asked to allow the construction of temple in the birthplace of God SriRam..   The interesting fact is that the Babari Masjid was not a Masjid with daily worshipping or prayers. It was just a structure build to show the might of Islam over Hinduism after defeating the Hindu kingdom.
  
This structure did not have any minarets (essential for Azan – call for prayer) nor a water-pool for Wazu (ablution) which are mandatory requirements for a mosque. This shows that this building was not a holy mosque, but a monument to celebrate ‘the enslavement of Hindusthan by Islam.

So why shouldn’t have the babri demolished..  It was a symbol of slavery and it was necessary to go off.


The demolition of Babri masjid was a necessary work to bring back the might of Hindus,  moreover it was their affection, love, pious towards God Sri Ram.   Thousands of people gave their life while stopping Baburs force from destructing the Ram Temple and erecting Babri.  The Muslims now crying for Babri masjid are forgetting some important Things.  They have to remember that their forefathers were Hindus and these Muslim rulers who invaded India  forcibly converted them. They have to remember how much pain they have took from the hands of these cruel kings.  Now the Muslims wanted to protect the Babri but their forefathers who were Hindus wanted to protect Ram Temple.

Finally every Hindu/Indian can smile , because they succeeded in demolishing a structure built by a foreign invader after killing thousands of Indians.  I congratulate all behind this movement .  Now the immediate step is to build a Ram Temple in Ayodhya  and a Masjid in a nearby place for Muslims if they wish, but outside of Ayodhya.

  

THE TRUTH BEHIND THE CONVERSION OF MADHAVIKUTTY TO ISLAM

 'He asked me to become a Muslim'    MADHAVIKUTTY (KAMLA DAS)   

Kamla Das alias Madhavi kutty(31 March 1934 – 31 May 2009)  was a notable, major Indian English poet and littérateur and at the same time a leading Malayalam author from Kerala, India. She converted to Islam at the Age of 65 after falling into the false love of Sadiq Ali , aged 38 who was a Muslim league MP.  ( now Leela menon ,an old friend of Madhavikutty revealed that Sadiq Ali is known in public as Abdul Samad Samdani)Nobody didn't knew about what it happens, and can't imagine why, but suddenly aristocratic, upper-caste Hindu Kamala Das, lover of Sree Krishna(Hindu God), descendant of rajas, decides to embrace Islam..      On 16 December 1999,at the age of 65, amidst a storm of controversy, in a one minute home ceremony, she converts……Kamla said to an interviewer..  ""Islam is the religion of love. Hindus have abused and hurt me. They have often tried to scandalize me. I want to love and be loved." She also told that she is taking Krishna from the Guruvayur temple, naming him Mohammed, and making him a prophet. "If you go to Guruvayur, you will not see Krishna there. He is with me.""But you're so fond of Krishna. How could you abandon him?" asks the astonished journalist, aware, as is everyone in Kerala, that Guruvayur is a Krishna temple and also the temple of Kamala's ancestress.
"I haven't abandoned him. He's still with me, he's in my house.""How can he be in a Muslim house?""I've just had to rename him Mohammed," she says, confounding conventional religious logic, or asserting one more ecumenical. "My grandmother told me as a child I was married to Krishna. I have seen Krishna, played with him and eaten with him. I love Krishna, and that love will never die. The essence of Krishna is within me, it's only that the name has changed."Kamlas life was threatened and  the Vishwa Hindu Parishad has taken her to court for abusing Hinduism in her remarks about Guruvayur, and they said  that she converted because Muslims promised her a seat in government or an Assembly candidature, or so that Ishmail Merchant would film one of her books.                                                                             
                                 *********************           ***********************                                                                                                               She was a longtime friend of Canadian  writer Merrily Weisbord, who published a memoir of their friendship, The Love Queen of Malabar, in 2010
 A month after her conversion, Kamala's enlightening letter to her friend Merrily Weisbord explain the Truth behind her Conversion
Dearest Merrily,Life has changed for me since Nov. 14 when a young man named Sadiq Ali walked in to meet me. He is 38 and has a beautiful smile. Afterwards he began to woo me on the phone from Abu Dhabi and Dubai, reciting Urdu couplets and telling me of what he would do to me after our marriage. I took my nurse Mini and went to his place in my car. I stayed with him for three days. There was a sunlit river, some trees, and a lot of laughter. He asked me to become a Muslim which I did on my return home. The Press and other media rushed in. The Hindu fanatics, Shiv Sena and the RSS pasted posters all over the place, "Madhavikutty is insane. Put her to death." I refused the eight policemen sent to protect me. There are young men, all Muslims, now occupying the guest flat and keeping vigil twenty-four hours a day. I have received court orders restraining me from going out or addressing more than six people at a time. Among the Muslims I have become a cult figure all dressed in black purdah and learning Arabic.My Hindu relatives and friends keep a distance from me. They wish to turn me into a social outcast. My sister visited me twice but wept all the time. I cannot visit my old mother. Otherwise life is exciting…Affectionately,
Kamala Das (Suraiya) 
Merrily Weisbord  describes what she have noticed and experienced with kamla surayya, when she flew to cochin ,after receiving the letter…."I open myself to a laughing, entrancing Kamala in burqua and black. We've been talking for hours, between and over the heads of the new cast of Muslim visitors
I notice too that Kamala's posture and body language are looser and more relaxed than on my last visit. She says Muslims are friendlier than Hindus, and with them she feels a complicity and trust. There's more laughter in the house and she looks radiant – dark eyes bright, full lips puckering, gold on neck, diamonds in nose – her face dramatically framed by a regal, high-capped, black chador.Whatever her new reality, Kamala's warmth to me is unchanged. 

She shows me a shiny silver cell phone resting like an idol on a pedestal, and says it is a gift from thirty-eight-year-old Sadiq Ali, Islamic scholar, national Muslim League MP from Malabar, and her absent lover. All day she wears the phone on a gold belt slung rebelliously around the waist of her black dress, keeping the line open and, as he requested, "dedicated to our love." As her bangles flash and her visitors delight, Kamala listens for the phone strapped to her body. She longs for Sadiq Ali to call. And when the visitors leave, she tells me that after their first meeting, he called for days, at midnight, every night".Sadiq Ali asked Kamala's cousin to arrange a meeting. He said he had admired Kamala for years and wanted to meet her. Kamala gave him a two-hour appointment, and Sadiq Ali drove five hours from his small town to Cochin."He sat at my feet laughing the attractive, reckless laugh of a monarch. He was a preacher who delighted large audiences with ballads and narratives lasting five hours. He held his listeners in a spell with his four-octave range and a pure voice that resembled a newborn's cry."Sadiq Ali charmed Kamala with his eloquence, scholarship, rough wavy hair, white teeth, and "smile of wondrous innocence." He asked if she would permit herself to be photographed with him, and they posed on the cane sofa, nibbling on plum cake, laughing together. "I no longer recollect the topics of our first conversation, but laughter entered our home as spontaneously as sunshine that morning, filling each crevice of emptiness.""Feed me," Sadiq Ali requested playfully, when Kamala allowed the two hours to stretch into lunch."But I cannot touch your lips," Kamala responded. Her grandmother had warned that Muslims ate the corpses of sacred cows, which made their breath stink, and that touching them led to exile. "A staunch vegetarian like me would never touch the mouth of a mlecha [flesh eater]," she said."Then I will feed you," Sadiq Ali offered, breaking food into small pieces.By the time he left Kamala's home, his flirtatious play had stirred long-buried feelings and desires. "For many years I had not witnessed the blush spread on the cheek of a young man finding himself embarked on a new love."And it had been many decades since she had felt desire, that slow ache in the abdomen, blood surging as on a fast-moving swing."I was almost asleep when Sadiq Ali climbed in beside me, holding me, breathing softly, whispering endearments, kissing my face, breasts ... and when he entered me, it was the first time I had ever experienced what it was like to feel a man from the inside."                     
                                 ***    ***  ***
She becomes a Muslim and puts on the purdah and learns the principal tenets of Islam, visits the Middle East and becomes a star speaker like a religious convention speaker in front of thousands of people to propagate the Prophet's message.Returning from giving lectures in Qatar and  flying on the wings of adoration, she calls Sadiq Ali. He answers and immediately passes the phone to his first wife, who responds rudely and hangs up. Kamala puts the phone back pensively. "A story An Incomplete Love Story, I wrote came out last week in Malayalam. A sad love story about a love between a Muslim and Hindu. Perhaps they recognized Sadiq Ali, and that's why they are so unkind. 

The phone call to Sadiq Ali has brought her crashing down from the heights of QatarSadiq Ali Slipped Away from her life …. He had cheated kamla so brilliantly.. Sadiq already had 2 wives, but he promised Kamla that he will marry her, if she convert to Islam. She converted in the hope that she will get true love…..Her Conversion was against her relatives and thousands of her followers sentiments.. In her novels and autobiography she wrote much about eroticism and the need of sex for woman…  

She married at age of 15 to a 35 year old man, and literally got raped in the first night..  We have to believe that she wasn't satisfied by her husband and she was yearning   for true love…. That's why after her husband's death, when sadiq came into her life she easily gave up …But sadiq was determined to convert kamla to Islam by playing the love saga..  It has to be believed that he has got mental and physical support in playing the role . 

He never loved her truly, but he just wants to convert her to Islam… It was clearly a sign of LOVE JIHAD…. Yes, Kamala das was one of the earliest victim of love Jihad, which is still happening in kerala. 

According to Government records about 9000 Hindu girls got converted to islam by falling prey to the false love of muslim boys. Most of them undergone through the same fate of Kamla Das.

 Later, Madhavikutty(Kamla) felt it was not worth it to change one's religion and said "I fell in love with a Muslim after my husband's death. He was kind and generous in the beginning. But I now feel one shouldn't change one's religion. It is not worth it.".
But It was Too Late for her ,for another conversion back to Hinduism . She lived and died rest of her life as a Muslim painfully….

    

CPIM is making people fool

The Communist Party has done a bucket money collection from all over the kerala in name of the Bengal people on August 7th and 8th 2011. Party secretery Pinarayi Vijayan has started this drama. According to CPIM their is an immediate necessity to help the people of bengal and after collecting the money from every single house in kerala,they are going to handover it to Bengal's CPIM leaders and they will suddenly help the poor people in Bengal.When i asked one CPIM activist who indulged in this drama he told me that many party workers have been killed in bengal by the Trinmool Congress.
What a funny drama was this. Still a highly literate state like Kerala had helped the party to increse its fund. More than 5 crore rupees have been collected by the 2 days collection process.
Now as an Ordinary Man I have to think beyond this drama. CPIM has ruled the state of West bengal for about 34 years and the condition of Bengal is Pathetic.They helped the people to become poorest from poor.But when they lose their rule by the smart thinking of Bengali people they suddenly become aware about the poor situation of Bengal and spending their valuable time to help them.
While thinking about their claim that party workers have been killed by opposition party, we have to be believe the leading newspapers in the country to know the real truth. Two days before this shocking news came , which says that police had found lots of skeltons in the backyard of a former CPIM minister's home.A Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) activist Biman Ghosh was arrested August 15Monday in the Midnapore skeleton case, which has already landed a former West Bengal minister in police custody.
What you think about all this incident.What is this CPIM upto.How long they can make the people fool. What cant the educated people see the real colour of their skin.